Class AutomatedReasoningPolicyGeneratedTestCase
- All Implemented Interfaces:
Serializable,SdkPojo,ToCopyableBuilder<AutomatedReasoningPolicyGeneratedTestCase.Builder,AutomatedReasoningPolicyGeneratedTestCase>
Represents a generated test case, consisting of query content, guard content, and expected results.
- See Also:
-
Nested Class Summary
Nested ClassesModifier and TypeClassDescriptionstatic interface -
Method Summary
Modifier and TypeMethodDescriptionbuilder()final booleanfinal booleanequalsBySdkFields(Object obj) Indicates whether some other object is "equal to" this one by SDK fields.The expected results of the generated test case.final StringThe expected results of the generated test case.final <T> Optional<T> getValueForField(String fieldName, Class<T> clazz) final StringThe output content that's validated by the Automated Reasoning policy.final inthashCode()final StringThe input query or prompt that generated the content.static Class<? extends AutomatedReasoningPolicyGeneratedTestCase.Builder> Take this object and create a builder that contains all of the current property values of this object.final StringtoString()Returns a string representation of this object.Methods inherited from interface software.amazon.awssdk.utils.builder.ToCopyableBuilder
copy
-
Method Details
-
queryContent
The input query or prompt that generated the content. This provides context for the validation.
- Returns:
- The input query or prompt that generated the content. This provides context for the validation.
-
guardContent
The output content that's validated by the Automated Reasoning policy. This represents the foundation model response that will be checked for accuracy.
- Returns:
- The output content that's validated by the Automated Reasoning policy. This represents the foundation model response that will be checked for accuracy.
-
expectedAggregatedFindingsResult
The expected results of the generated test case. Possible values include:
-
VALID- The claims are true. The claims are implied by the premises and the Automated Reasoning policy. Given the Automated Reasoning policy and premises, it is not possible for these claims to be false. In other words, there are no alternative answers that are true that contradict the claims. -
INVALID- The claims are false. The claims are not implied by the premises and Automated Reasoning policy. Furthermore, there exists different claims that are consistent with the premises and Automated Reasoning policy. -
SATISFIABLE- The claims can be true or false. It depends on what assumptions are made for the claim to be implied from the premises and Automated Reasoning policy rules. In this situation, different assumptions can make input claims false and alternative claims true. -
IMPOSSIBLE- Automated Reasoning can’t make a statement about the claims. This can happen if the premises are logically incorrect, or if there is a conflict within the Automated Reasoning policy itself.
If the service returns an enum value that is not available in the current SDK version,
expectedAggregatedFindingsResultwill returnAutomatedReasoningCheckResult.UNKNOWN_TO_SDK_VERSION. The raw value returned by the service is available fromexpectedAggregatedFindingsResultAsString().- Returns:
- The expected results of the generated test case. Possible values include:
-
VALID- The claims are true. The claims are implied by the premises and the Automated Reasoning policy. Given the Automated Reasoning policy and premises, it is not possible for these claims to be false. In other words, there are no alternative answers that are true that contradict the claims. -
INVALID- The claims are false. The claims are not implied by the premises and Automated Reasoning policy. Furthermore, there exists different claims that are consistent with the premises and Automated Reasoning policy. -
SATISFIABLE- The claims can be true or false. It depends on what assumptions are made for the claim to be implied from the premises and Automated Reasoning policy rules. In this situation, different assumptions can make input claims false and alternative claims true. -
IMPOSSIBLE- Automated Reasoning can’t make a statement about the claims. This can happen if the premises are logically incorrect, or if there is a conflict within the Automated Reasoning policy itself.
-
- See Also:
-
-
expectedAggregatedFindingsResultAsString
The expected results of the generated test case. Possible values include:
-
VALID- The claims are true. The claims are implied by the premises and the Automated Reasoning policy. Given the Automated Reasoning policy and premises, it is not possible for these claims to be false. In other words, there are no alternative answers that are true that contradict the claims. -
INVALID- The claims are false. The claims are not implied by the premises and Automated Reasoning policy. Furthermore, there exists different claims that are consistent with the premises and Automated Reasoning policy. -
SATISFIABLE- The claims can be true or false. It depends on what assumptions are made for the claim to be implied from the premises and Automated Reasoning policy rules. In this situation, different assumptions can make input claims false and alternative claims true. -
IMPOSSIBLE- Automated Reasoning can’t make a statement about the claims. This can happen if the premises are logically incorrect, or if there is a conflict within the Automated Reasoning policy itself.
If the service returns an enum value that is not available in the current SDK version,
expectedAggregatedFindingsResultwill returnAutomatedReasoningCheckResult.UNKNOWN_TO_SDK_VERSION. The raw value returned by the service is available fromexpectedAggregatedFindingsResultAsString().- Returns:
- The expected results of the generated test case. Possible values include:
-
VALID- The claims are true. The claims are implied by the premises and the Automated Reasoning policy. Given the Automated Reasoning policy and premises, it is not possible for these claims to be false. In other words, there are no alternative answers that are true that contradict the claims. -
INVALID- The claims are false. The claims are not implied by the premises and Automated Reasoning policy. Furthermore, there exists different claims that are consistent with the premises and Automated Reasoning policy. -
SATISFIABLE- The claims can be true or false. It depends on what assumptions are made for the claim to be implied from the premises and Automated Reasoning policy rules. In this situation, different assumptions can make input claims false and alternative claims true. -
IMPOSSIBLE- Automated Reasoning can’t make a statement about the claims. This can happen if the premises are logically incorrect, or if there is a conflict within the Automated Reasoning policy itself.
-
- See Also:
-
-
toBuilder
Description copied from interface:ToCopyableBuilderTake this object and create a builder that contains all of the current property values of this object.- Specified by:
toBuilderin interfaceToCopyableBuilder<AutomatedReasoningPolicyGeneratedTestCase.Builder,AutomatedReasoningPolicyGeneratedTestCase> - Returns:
- a builder for type T
-
builder
-
serializableBuilderClass
public static Class<? extends AutomatedReasoningPolicyGeneratedTestCase.Builder> serializableBuilderClass() -
hashCode
-
equals
-
equalsBySdkFields
Description copied from interface:SdkPojoIndicates whether some other object is "equal to" this one by SDK fields. An SDK field is a modeled, non-inherited field in anSdkPojoclass, and is generated based on a service model.If an
SdkPojoclass does not have any inherited fields,equalsBySdkFieldsandequalsare essentially the same.- Specified by:
equalsBySdkFieldsin interfaceSdkPojo- Parameters:
obj- the object to be compared with- Returns:
- true if the other object equals to this object by sdk fields, false otherwise.
-
toString
-
getValueForField
-
sdkFields
-
sdkFieldNameToField
- Specified by:
sdkFieldNameToFieldin interfaceSdkPojo- Returns:
- The mapping between the field name and its corresponding field.
-